Log inTry for free

EPA enforcement actions against wastewater plants in Kansas

38 formal actions at 29 of 355 plants · $177,188 in penalties · 3 EPA inspections

EPA's enforcement records list 38 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Kansas, 10 of them since fiscal year 2020. The cases involve 29 of the state's 355 plants, with $177,188 in penalties assessed. The most common ground is npdes permit violations (21 cases). EPA has inspected 2 plants in the state, 3 inspections in total. Every plant links to its profile, and every case to its report on EPA's ECHO site.

Recent enforcement actions in Kansas

The 10 most recent formal EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Kansas, by latest case status date. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
PlantDateTypeLaw sectionOutcomePenaltySource
Wellington, City Of
Wellington
May 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2026-0186
EPA's description: “Facility experienced effluent noncompliance for Ammonia, E.coli, and BOD during years 2021 ? 2025. The facility is not following the compliance schedule timeframes to reduce phosphorus discharges.…”
Elk City Waste Water Treatment Plant C/o City Hall
Elk City
Feb 2026
FY2024
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2024-0007
EPA's description: “Administrative Order on Consent issued to Elk City, for failure to maintain a locational running annual average for total trihalomethanes below the maximum contaminant level established in 40 C.F.R.…”
Mcpherson Wastewater Plant
Mcpherson
Jan 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2026-0072
EPA's description: “This Administrative Compliance Order seeks a compliance plan to resolve violations for the City of McPherson NPDES pretreatment permit violations.”
Conway Springs, City Of
Conway Springs
Nov 2025
FY2016
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2016-0067
Arkansas City Mwwtp
Arkansas City
Sep 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order With Penalty
$3,000ECHO 07-2025-0098
EPA's description: “Facility generates Class A biosolids for public sale. The biosolids did not meet the requirements of 503.”
Wellington, City Of
Wellington
Aug 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order With Penalty
$12,000ECHO 07-2025-0089
EPA's description: “Facility was not sampling according to the sampling frequency per 503. The facility land applied biosolids that exceeded metals limitations specific in 503.”
Eudora, City Of
Eudora
Aug 2025
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2023-0122
EPA's description: “Noncompliance with maintenance of UV light bank, aeration basin, leaking air blowers, malfunctioning flow meter and inadequate backup power supply”
Bonner Springs, City Of
Bonner Springs
Jun 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2025-0047
EPA's description: “This Consent Agreement seeks to resolve violations for the City of Bonner Springs NPDES violations.”
Leavenworth, City Of
Leavenworth
Apr 2025
FY2016
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2016-0044
Spring Hill No. 2 (mechanical)
Spring Hill
Feb 2025
FY2022
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2022-0069
EPA's description: “The order addresses effluent violations of ammonia, E. coli, total nitrogen and total phosphorus, failure to apply for an industrial stormwater permit, and failure to properly operate and maintain…”

Full case histories, milestones, violation types and EPA's complete case summaries for every plant are shown with a free Klarifi account. Create one

Largest penalties in Kansas

The 9 largest penalties assessed in EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Kansas, with the value of the compliance actions each case required. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
#PlantDateTypeOutcomePenaltyCompliance actionsSource
1Kansas City Water Pollution Control Div.
Kansas City
May 2020
FY2008
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$50,000$65MECHO 07-2008-0163
2Leavenworth, City Of
Leavenworth
Sep 2017
FY2016
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$46,200—ECHO 07-2016-0119
3Parsons WWTP
Parsons
May 2017
FY2017
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$20,000—ECHO 07-2017-0100
4Salina, City Of
Salina
Jun 2020
FY2019
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$15,188—ECHO 07-2019-0041
5Wellington, City Of
Wellington
Aug 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$12,000—ECHO 07-2025-0089
6Iola, City Of
Iola
Nov 2012
FY2013
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$12,000—ECHO 07-2013-0002
7City Of Coffeyville WTP
Coffeyville
Jan 2021
FY2020
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$9,700—ECHO 07-2020-0181
8Caney Sewer Treatment Plant
Caney
Jul 2015
FY2014
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$9,100$12,356ECHO 07-2014-0015
9Arkansas City Mwwtp
Arkansas City
Sep 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$3,000—ECHO 07-2025-0098

Actions by fiscal year

Fiscal yearFormal actionsPenalties
FY20180—
FY20191$15,188
FY20201$9,700
FY20210—
FY20221—
FY20231—
FY20242—
FY20253$15,000
FY20262—
FY20270—

EPA fiscal years run from 1 October to 30 September. The current year is partial.

EPA enforcement in Kansas: questions

  1. How many EPA enforcement actions have been taken against wastewater plants in Kansas?

    EPA's enforcement records list 38 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Kansas, 10 of them since fiscal year 2020. They involve 29 of the state's 355 plants. Informal actions such as notices of violation are not counted here.

  2. Which Kansas wastewater plant received the largest EPA penalty?

    Kansas City Water Pollution Control Div. in Kansas City: $50,000 assessed in fiscal year 2008 (UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY AND KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, Final Order With Penalty). Penalties are the amounts EPA records as assessed or agreed, not necessarily what was collected.

  3. What does an EPA administrative order mean for a wastewater plant?

    Most cases here are administrative orders under section 309 of the Clean Water Act: EPA finds permit violations, usually effluent limits or discharge without a permit, and orders the plant to return to compliance, often with a corrective action plan, a schedule and sometimes a penalty. Judicial cases go through the Department of Justice and typically end in a consent decree with a capital programme behind it. The latest case in Kansas is from May 2026.

Enforcement data: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO. Penalties are the amounts assessed or agreed in each case as EPA records them. Latest case status in this data: May 2026.

Try Klarifi for free

Create your own trial account and explore how Klarifi can help you.

Try for freeOr book a demo
Wastewater market intelligence: facilities, permits, compliance and capital projects for North America and Europe.
© 2026 Klarifi ApS, Diplomvej 381, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Public data refreshed Nov 2, 2026