Log inTry for free

EPA enforcement actions against wastewater plants in Ohio

109 formal actions at 83 of 844 plants · $5.2M in penalties · 7 EPA inspections

EPA's enforcement records list 109 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Ohio, 30 of them since fiscal year 2020. The cases involve 83 of the state's 844 plants, with $5.2 million in penalties assessed. The most common ground is npdes permit violations (58 cases). EPA has inspected 7 plants in the state, 7 inspections in total. Every plant links to its profile, and every case to its report on EPA's ECHO site.

Recent enforcement actions in Ohio

The 10 most recent formal EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Ohio, by latest case status date. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
PlantDateTypeLaw sectionOutcomePenaltySource
Fostoria City Dump
Fostoria
Aug 2026
FY2003
Judicial case
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order With Penalty
$15,000ECHO 05-2003-0653
EPA's description: “CSO related referral. 1st Amended Consent Decree to extend the construction completion date to the 2029 date. CD Amendment does not affect the penalty, pollution reduction, or anything else.”
Doylestown WPCF
Doylestown
Aug 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-1076
Arlington Village-Arlington Village
Arlington
Aug 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-1075
EPA's description: “Village of Arlington WWTP AOC”
Hayden Heights Mhp
Dublin
Jul 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0328
Port Clinton WWTP
Port Clinton
May 2026
FY1997
Judicial case
NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Final Order With Penalty & Specified Cost Recovery
$60,000ECHO 05-1997-0389
Defiance Water Pollution Control Plant
Defiance
May 2026
FY2024
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2024-0328
Alger WWTP
Alger
Mar 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0317
Oak Harbor WWTP
Oak Harbor
Mar 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0313
Woodville WWTP
Woodville
Feb 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0309
EPA's description: “Replaces AOC Finalized in March 2025”
Middleport Village Pws
Middleport
Sep 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2025-1048
EPA's description: “The EPA is issuing Administrative Orders (AO or Order) to public water systems for failure to comply with the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA Region…”

Full case histories, milestones, violation types and EPA's complete case summaries for every plant are shown with a free Klarifi account. Create one

Largest penalties in Ohio

The 10 largest penalties assessed in EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Ohio, with the value of the compliance actions each case required. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
#PlantDateTypeOutcomePenaltyCompliance actionsSource
1Metropolitan Sewer Dis Little Miami WWTP
Cincinnati
and 1 other plant named in the case
May 2025
FY1998
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$1.2M$3,290MECHO 05-1998-0750
2Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center
Cleveland
and 2 other plants named in the case
Sep 2024
FY2003
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$1.2M$3,033MECHO 05-2003-0627
3Akron WRF
Akron
Nov 2023
FY2003
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$500,000$905MECHO 05-2003-0628
4Middletown Wastewater Treatment Plant
Middletown
Feb 1995
FY1991
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$288,000—ECHO 05-1991-0131
5City Of Elyria Wastewater Pollution Control Plant
Elyria
Jan 2023
FY2015
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$200,000$250MECHO 05-2015-0316
6Akron WRF
Akron
Aug 1995
FY1988
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$191,400—ECHO 05-1988-0054
7City Of Euclid, Wastewater Treatment Plant
Euclid
Oct 2011
FY2005
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$150,000$150MECHO 05-2005-0324
8City Of Euclid, Wastewater Treatment Plant
Euclid
Apr 1991
FY1982
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$130,000—ECHO 05-1982-0071
9Lakewood WWTP
Lakewood
Jan 2023
FY2015
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$100,000$80MECHO 05-2015-0317
10Ironton WWTP
Ironton
Feb 2024
FY2005
Judicial case
Final Order Entered
$98,000$13MECHO 05-2005-0325

Actions by fiscal year

Fiscal yearFormal actionsPenalties
FY20181—
FY20191—
FY20202—
FY20212—
FY20224—
FY20238—
FY20244—
FY20254—
FY20266—
FY20270—

EPA fiscal years run from 1 October to 30 September. The current year is partial.

EPA enforcement in Ohio: questions

  1. How many EPA enforcement actions have been taken against wastewater plants in Ohio?

    EPA's enforcement records list 109 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Ohio, 30 of them since fiscal year 2020. They involve 83 of the state's 844 plants. Informal actions such as notices of violation are not counted here.

  2. Which Ohio wastewater plant received the largest EPA penalty?

    Metropolitan Sewer Dis Little Miami WWTP in Cincinnati: $1.2 million assessed in fiscal year 1998 (HAMILTON COUNTY, Final Order Entered). Penalties are the amounts EPA records as assessed or agreed, not necessarily what was collected.

  3. What does an EPA administrative order mean for a wastewater plant?

    Most cases here are administrative orders under section 309 of the Clean Water Act: EPA finds permit violations, usually effluent limits or discharge without a permit, and orders the plant to return to compliance, often with a corrective action plan, a schedule and sometimes a penalty. Judicial cases go through the Department of Justice and typically end in a consent decree with a capital programme behind it. The latest case in Ohio is from Aug 2026.

Enforcement data: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO. Penalties are the amounts assessed or agreed in each case as EPA records them. Latest case status in this data: Aug 2026.

Try Klarifi for free

Create your own trial account and explore how Klarifi can help you.

Try for freeOr book a demo
Wastewater market intelligence: facilities, permits, compliance and capital projects for North America and Europe.
© 2026 Klarifi ApS, Diplomvej 381, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Public data refreshed Nov 2, 2026