Log inTry for free

EPA enforcement actions against wastewater plants in Wisconsin

33 formal actions at 19 of 394 plants · $297,674 in penalties · 29 EPA inspections

EPA's enforcement records list 33 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Wisconsin, 16 of them since fiscal year 2020. The cases involve 19 of the state's 394 plants, with $297,674 in penalties assessed. The most common ground is npdes permit violations (16 cases). EPA has inspected 8 plants in the state, 29 inspections in total. Every plant links to its profile, and every case to its report on EPA's ECHO site.

Recent enforcement actions in Wisconsin

The 10 most recent formal EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Wisconsin, by latest case status date. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
PlantDateTypeLaw sectionOutcomePenaltySource
Stockbridge-Munsee Indian Tr
Bowler
May 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0319
EPA's description: “AOC sets out measures to correct alleged NPDES violations.”
Laona Sanitary Dist
Laona
Mar 2026
FY2025
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2025-1069
EPA's description: “The EPA is issuing Administrative Orders (AO or Order) to public water systems for failure to comply with the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA Region…”
Bad River Wwwtp
Odanah
Jan 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0304
EPA's description: “AOC sets out measures to correct alleged NPDES violations.”
Bad River Wwwtp
Odanah
Dec 2025
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-0302
EPA's description: “AOC sets out measures to correct alleged NPDES violations.”
Kieler Sanitary District 1
Kieler
Dec 2025
FY2026
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2026-1058
EPA's description: “The EPA is issuing Administrative Orders (AO or Order) to public water systems for failure to comply with the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA Region…”
Oneida WWTF
Oneida
Apr 2025
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2023-0302
EPA's description: “Final AOC for the Oneida WWTP”
Soldiers Grove Wastewater Treatment Facility
Soldiers Grove
Aug 2023
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2023-0334
EPA's description: “The attached final Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) mitigates potential violations of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act.”
Red Cliff Band WWTF
Bayfield
Jul 2023
FY2022
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Superseded by Another Enforcement Action
—ECHO 05-2022-0321
EPA's description: “AOC will require the Band to implement treatment process improvements and construct a new alum treatment system to address the remaining effluent limit violations.”
Red Cliff Band WWTF
Bayfield
Jul 2023
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2023-0339
Lac Courte Oreilles
Hayward
Jan 2023
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2023-0311
EPA's description: “final Administrative Order on Consent (?AOC?) designed to bring the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians? (LCO) Reserve Lagoon facility (?Facility?) into compliance with its…”

Full case histories, milestones, violation types and EPA's complete case summaries for every plant are shown with a free Klarifi account. Create one

Largest penalties in Wisconsin

The 7 largest penalties assessed in EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Wisconsin, with the value of the compliance actions each case required. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
#PlantDateTypeOutcomePenaltyCompliance actionsSource
1Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District
Green Bay
Apr 2022
FY2022
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$260,000—ECHO 05-2022-5016
2Sparta Wastewater Treatment Facility
Sparta
Jun 1991
FY1990
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$20,000—ECHO 05-1990-0271
3US Army Fort Mccoy
Fort Mccoy
Jun 1996
FY1993
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$6,084$11,358ECHO 05-1993-1351
4US Army Fort Mccoy
Fort Mccoy
Dec 2022
FY2023
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$4,700—ECHO 05-2023-2005
5US Army Fort Mccoy
Fort Mccoy
Dec 2022
FY2023
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$4,700—ECHO 05-2023-2017
6Fox River Water Pollution Control Center
Brookfield
Feb 2005
FY2005
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$1,250—ECHO 05-2005-1234
7US Army Fort Mccoy
Fort Mccoy
Dec 2022
FY2023
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$940—ECHO 05-2023-2004

Actions by fiscal year

Fiscal yearFormal actionsPenalties
FY20181—
FY20194—
FY20200—
FY20210—
FY20224$260,000
FY20237$10,340
FY20240—
FY20251—
FY20264—
FY20270—

EPA fiscal years run from 1 October to 30 September. The current year is partial.

EPA enforcement in Wisconsin: questions

  1. How many EPA enforcement actions have been taken against wastewater plants in Wisconsin?

    EPA's enforcement records list 33 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Wisconsin, 16 of them since fiscal year 2020. They involve 19 of the state's 394 plants. Informal actions such as notices of violation are not counted here.

  2. Which Wisconsin wastewater plant received the largest EPA penalty?

    Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District in Green Bay: $260,000 assessed in fiscal year 2022 (GREEN BAY METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT (NEW WATER) - APO/CAFO, Final Order With Penalty). Penalties are the amounts EPA records as assessed or agreed, not necessarily what was collected.

  3. What does an EPA administrative order mean for a wastewater plant?

    Most cases here are administrative orders under section 309 of the Clean Water Act: EPA finds permit violations, usually effluent limits or discharge without a permit, and orders the plant to return to compliance, often with a corrective action plan, a schedule and sometimes a penalty. Judicial cases go through the Department of Justice and typically end in a consent decree with a capital programme behind it. The latest case in Wisconsin is from May 2026.

Enforcement data: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO. Penalties are the amounts assessed or agreed in each case as EPA records them. Latest case status in this data: May 2026.

Try Klarifi for free

Create your own trial account and explore how Klarifi can help you.

Try for freeOr book a demo
Wastewater market intelligence: facilities, permits, compliance and capital projects for North America and Europe.
© 2026 Klarifi ApS, Diplomvej 381, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Public data refreshed Nov 2, 2026