Log inTry for free

EPA enforcement actions against wastewater plants in Missouri

103 formal actions at 77 of 671 plants · $2.6M in penalties · 21 EPA inspections

EPA's enforcement records list 103 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Missouri, 17 of them since fiscal year 2020. The cases involve 77 of the state's 671 plants, with $2.6 million in penalties assessed. The most common ground is npdes permit violations (63 cases). EPA has inspected 19 plants in the state, 21 inspections in total. Every plant links to its profile, and every case to its report on EPA's ECHO site.

Recent enforcement actions in Missouri

The 10 most recent formal EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Missouri, by latest case status date. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
PlantDateTypeLaw sectionOutcomePenaltySource
Smithville WTP
Smithville
Aug 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 07-2026-0168
EPA's description: “EPA seeks to resolve claims against the city of Smithville, MO for violations of its CWA NPDES permit.”
Bertrand WWTF
Bertrand
Jul 2026
FY2025
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2025-0175
EPA's description: “Administrative order issued to the public water system for non-compliance with the SDWA for failure to submit the service line inventory pursuant to the SDWA regulations at 40 C.F.R. ?? 141.84(a) and…”
Annapolis Pws
Annapolis
Jan 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2026-0031
EPA's description: “Administrative order issued to the public water system for non-compliance with the SDWA for failure to submit the service line inventory pursuant to the SDWA regulations at 40 C.F.R. ?? 141.84(a) and…”
Granby Pws
Granby
Dec 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
Sewage Sludge Disposal
Final Order With Penalty
$1,750ECHO 07-2025-0134
EPA's description: “Respondent failed to comply with sections 405 and 503 of the CWA in the disposal of sewage sludge.”
Lebanon WWTP
Lebanon
Oct 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order With Penalty
$350ECHO 07-2025-0133
EPA's description: “Facility did not meet VAR requirements when biosolids were land applied.”
Granby Pws
Granby
Oct 2025
FY2015
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2015-0213
Nixa WWTF
Nixa
Oct 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order With Penalty
$3,000ECHO 07-2025-0113
EPA's description: “Facility land applied biosolids above the 40 CF 503.13 ceiling limits.”
St Clair Pws
St. Clair
Sep 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order With Penalty
—ECHO 07-2025-0100
Bloomfield WWTF
Bloomfield
Aug 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2025-0135
EPA's description: “EPA seeks to resolve claims against Bloomfield WWTF for violations of its NPDES permit.”
Rogersville WWTP
Rogersville
Aug 2025
FY2025
Administrative order
National Drinking Water Regulations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 07-2025-0145
EPA's description: “Administrative order issued to the public water system for non-compliance with the SDWA for failure to submit the service line inventory pursuant to the SDWA regulations at 40 C.F.R. ?? 141.84(a) and…”

Full case histories, milestones, violation types and EPA's complete case summaries for every plant are shown with a free Klarifi account. Create one

Largest penalties in Missouri

The 10 largest penalties assessed in EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Missouri, with the value of the compliance actions each case required. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
#PlantDateTypeOutcomePenaltyCompliance actionsSource
1Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bissell Point WWTP
St. Louis
and 3 other plants named in the case
Apr 2012
FY2003
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$1.2M$4,700MECHO 07-2003-0343
2Kc, Westside WWTP
Kansas City
and 1 other plant named in the case
Sep 2010
FY2004
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$600,000$2,383MECHO 07-2004-0333
3Rock Creek Waste Treatment
Independence
Jul 2016
FY2008
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$255,000$35MECHO 07-2008-0132
4Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bissell Point WWTP
St. Louis
and 1 other plant named in the case
Apr 2003
FY1985
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$100,000—ECHO 07-1985-0156
5Campbell WWTF
Campbell
Mar 2002
FY2000
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$87,500—ECHO 07-2000-0433
6Farmington East WWTP
Farmington
and 1 other plant named in the case
Jul 2011
FY2011
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$61,566—ECHO 07-2011-0182
7Sedalia Southeast WWTP
Sedalia
and 1 other plant named in the case
Jun 1997
FY1997
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$50,000—ECHO 07-1997-0012
8St. Joseph Water Protection Facility
Saint Joseph
Sep 2013
FY2013
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$28,000—ECHO 07-2013-0227
9Jefferson City Rwrf
Jefferson City
Aug 2016
FY2014
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$25,000—ECHO 07-2014-0240
10Rockaway Beach
Rockaway Beach
Dec 2013
FY2013
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$23,000—ECHO 07-2013-0101

Actions by fiscal year

Fiscal yearFormal actionsPenalties
FY20180—
FY20192$19,200
FY20200—
FY20211$3,700
FY20222$22,200
FY20230—
FY20243$1,400
FY20259$5,100
FY20262—
FY20270—

EPA fiscal years run from 1 October to 30 September. The current year is partial.

EPA enforcement in Missouri: questions

  1. How many EPA enforcement actions have been taken against wastewater plants in Missouri?

    EPA's enforcement records list 103 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Missouri, 17 of them since fiscal year 2020. They involve 77 of the state's 671 plants. Informal actions such as notices of violation are not counted here.

  2. Which Missouri wastewater plant received the largest EPA penalty?

    Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bissell Point WWTP in St. Louis: $1.2 million assessed in fiscal year 2003 (METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT; MSD, Final Order With Penalty). Penalties are the amounts EPA records as assessed or agreed, not necessarily what was collected.

  3. What does an EPA administrative order mean for a wastewater plant?

    Most cases here are administrative orders under section 309 of the Clean Water Act: EPA finds permit violations, usually effluent limits or discharge without a permit, and orders the plant to return to compliance, often with a corrective action plan, a schedule and sometimes a penalty. Judicial cases go through the Department of Justice and typically end in a consent decree with a capital programme behind it. The latest case in Missouri is from Aug 2026.

Enforcement data: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO. Penalties are the amounts assessed or agreed in each case as EPA records them. Latest case status in this data: Aug 2026.

Try Klarifi for free

Create your own trial account and explore how Klarifi can help you.

Try for freeOr book a demo
Wastewater market intelligence: facilities, permits, compliance and capital projects for North America and Europe.
© 2026 Klarifi ApS, Diplomvej 381, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Public data refreshed Nov 2, 2026