Log inTry for free

EPA enforcement actions against wastewater plants in New Hampshire

47 formal actions at 19 of 47 plants · $205,950 in penalties · 6 EPA inspections

EPA's enforcement records list 47 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in New Hampshire, 8 of them since fiscal year 2020. The cases involve 19 of the state's 47 plants, with $205,950 in penalties assessed. The most common ground is npdes permit violations (24 cases). EPA has inspected 6 plants in the state, 6 inspections in total. Every plant links to its profile, and every case to its report on EPA's ECHO site.

Recent enforcement actions in New Hampshire

The 10 most recent formal EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in New Hampshire, by latest case status date. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
PlantDateTypeLaw sectionOutcomePenaltySource
Woodstock WWTF
Woodstock
Oct 2026
FY2027
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 01-2027-2001
EPA's description: “On October 2, 2026, the Region entered into an administrative order on consent ( AOC ) with the Town of Woodstock, New Hampshire requiring the Town to comply with the monitoring requirements for…”
Milford Wastewater Treatment Facility
Milford
Aug 2026
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 01-2023-2010
EPA's description: “On March 23, 2023, EPA issued a Clean Water Act (CWA) Administrative Order (Order) to the Town of Milford, New Hampshire that provides the Town an extension to two interim milestones in its National…”
Waterville Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant
Waterville Valley
Apr 2026
FY2026
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 01-2026-2022
EPA's description: “On April 28, 2026, the Region entered into an administrative order on consent ( AOC ) with the Town of Waterville Valley, New Hampshire memorializing the schedule agreed to between EPA and the Town…”
Waterville Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant
Waterville Valley
Aug 2024
FY2024
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 01-2024-2068
Rochester Wastewater Treatment Facility
Rochester
Mar 2024
FY2024
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 01-2024-2034
EPA's description: “On March 27, 2024, EPA entered into an administrative order on consent (AOC) with the City of Rochester, New Hampshire which provides a schedule for the City to meet its total phosphorus limit in its…”
Epping Wasterwater Treatment Facility
Epping
May 2023
FY2023
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 01-2023-2022
EPA's description: “On May 11, 2023, the Region issued an administrative order (AO) to the Town of Epping, New Hampshire to cease bypasses at its wastewater treatment plant. The plant discharges upstream of several…”
Epping Wasterwater Treatment Facility
Epping
Apr 2023
FY2016
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 01-2016-2023
Exeter Wastewater Treatment Facility
Exeter
Dec 2022
FY2013
Administrative order
NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 01-2013-2027
Berlin Pollution Control Facility
Berlin
Oct 2022
FY2011
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 01-2011-2501
EPA's description: “Region I issued a Clean Water Act (Act) Administrative Order to the City of Berlin, New Hampshire for violations of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Section…”
Leavitt E. Magrath Wastewater Treatment Facility
Hampton
Mar 2022
FY2022
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 01-2022-2010
EPA's description: “On March 14, 2021 the Region entered into an administrative order on consent (AOC) with the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire to provide a schedule for it to meet its Total Copper limit in its NPDES…”

Full case histories, milestones, violation types and EPA's complete case summaries for every plant are shown with a free Klarifi account. Create one

Largest penalties in New Hampshire

The 7 largest penalties assessed in EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in New Hampshire, with the value of the compliance actions each case required. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
#PlantDateTypeOutcomePenaltyCompliance actionsSource
1Pierce Island Wastewater Treatment Plant
Portsmouth
Oct 2003
FY1989
Judicial case
Final Order With Pen & Unspecified Cost Recovery
$100,000—ECHO 01-1989-0003
2Keene Wastewater Treatment Facility
Keene
Apr 2006
FY2005
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$58,000—ECHO 01-2005-2001
3Huckleberry Hill Wastewater Treatment Facility
Dover
Dec 2013
FY2005
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$36,000—ECHO 01-2005-2002
4Leavitt E. Magrath Wastewater Treatment Facility
Hampton
May 1998
FY1998
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$5,700—ECHO 01-1998-0055
5Lisbon Wastewater Treatment Facility
Lisbon
Jun 1998
FY1997
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$5,000—ECHO 01-1997-0022
6Town Of Bristol WWTF
Bristol
Oct 1997
FY1997
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$1,000—ECHO 01-1997-0117
7Suncook Wastewater Treatment Facility
Allenstown
Jun 1995
FY1995
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$250—ECHO 01-1995-0075

Actions by fiscal year

Fiscal yearFormal actionsPenalties
FY20180—
FY20191—
FY20200—
FY20211—
FY20221—
FY20232—
FY20242—
FY20250—
FY20261—
FY20271—

EPA fiscal years run from 1 October to 30 September. The current year is partial.

EPA enforcement in New Hampshire: questions

  1. How many EPA enforcement actions have been taken against wastewater plants in New Hampshire?

    EPA's enforcement records list 47 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in New Hampshire, 8 of them since fiscal year 2020. They involve 19 of the state's 47 plants. Informal actions such as notices of violation are not counted here.

  2. Which New Hampshire wastewater plant received the largest EPA penalty?

    Pierce Island Wastewater Treatment Plant in Portsmouth: $100,000 assessed in fiscal year 1989 (PORTSMOUTH, CITY OF, Final Order With Pen & Unspecified Cost Recovery). Penalties are the amounts EPA records as assessed or agreed, not necessarily what was collected.

  3. What does an EPA administrative order mean for a wastewater plant?

    Most cases here are administrative orders under section 309 of the Clean Water Act: EPA finds permit violations, usually effluent limits or discharge without a permit, and orders the plant to return to compliance, often with a corrective action plan, a schedule and sometimes a penalty. Judicial cases go through the Department of Justice and typically end in a consent decree with a capital programme behind it. The latest case in New Hampshire is from Oct 2026.

Enforcement data: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO. Penalties are the amounts assessed or agreed in each case as EPA records them. Latest case status in this data: Oct 2026.

Try Klarifi for free

Create your own trial account and explore how Klarifi can help you.

Try for freeOr book a demo
Wastewater market intelligence: facilities, permits, compliance and capital projects for North America and Europe.
© 2026 Klarifi ApS, Diplomvej 381, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Public data refreshed Nov 2, 2026