Log inTry for free

EPA enforcement actions against wastewater plants in Michigan

45 formal actions at 31 of 335 plants · $1M in penalties · 34 EPA inspections

EPA's enforcement records list 45 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Michigan, 3 of them since fiscal year 2020. The cases involve 31 of the state's 335 plants, with $1 million in penalties assessed. The most common ground is npdes permit violations (9 cases). EPA has inspected 29 plants in the state, 34 inspections in total. Every plant links to its profile, and every case to its report on EPA's ECHO site.

Recent enforcement actions in Michigan

The 10 most recent formal EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Michigan, by latest case status date. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
PlantDateTypeLaw sectionOutcomePenaltySource
Kalamazoo Water Reclamation Plant
Kalamazoo
Oct 2026
FY2025
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2025-0321
Mt Pleasant WWTP
Mount Pleasant
Jul 2023
FY2019
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2019-0331
EPA's description: “Final AOC regarding CWA Related effluent violations”
Isabella Reservation WWTP
Mount Pleasant
Jun 2021
FY2020
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2020-0306
EPA's description: “AOC sets out measures to correct the alleged violations and bring the facility into compliance.”
Sault Ste. Marie Wastewater Treatment Plant
Sault Sainte Marie
Apr 2020
FY2020
Administrative order
Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Final Order With Penalty
$11,200ECHO 05-2020-7550
Tecumseh WWTP
Tecumseh
May 2018
FY2018
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2018-0302
EPA's description: “final and effective Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) designed to bring the City of Tecumseh Wastewater Treatment Plant into compliance with the Clean Water Act.”
Sault Ste. Marie Wastewater Treatment Plant
Sault Sainte Marie
Jan 2018
FY2003
Administrative order
NPDES Permit Violations
Final Order No Penalty
—ECHO 05-2003-0389
EPA's description: “Exceeded permit effluent limits”
Saginaw Twp WWTP
Saginaw
Aug 2012
FY2012
Administrative order
Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Final Order With Penalty
$8,500ECHO 05-2012-7164
EPA's description: “This enforcement action was filed in response to violations to CAA 112(r)(7) which were discovered during a Risk Management Plan (RMP) compliance inspection conducted on 7/15/2009. A total of 13…”
Grand Haven/spring Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant
Grand Haven
Dec 2011
FY2012
Administrative order
Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Final Order With Penalty
$5,338ECHO 05-2012-7105
EPA's description: “This enforcement action has been filed in response to violations discovered during a CAA 112(r)(7) (Risk Management Plan) inspection which was conducted on 07/08/2008. Violations included: 1.)…”
GLWA Water Resource Recovery Facility
Detroit
Dec 2011
FY2012
Administrative order
General Duty/Accidental Release
Final Order Issued
—ECHO 05-2012-5012
EPA's description: “On December 9, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued an agreed Clean Air Act Section 303 Order to the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) alleging that a pollution source is…”
City Of Saginaw Wastewater Treatment Plant
Saginaw
Oct 2010
FY2011
Administrative order
Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Final Order With Penalty
$2,100ECHO 05-2011-7018
EPA's description: “This enforcement action was filed for violations to CAA 112(r)(7)(Risk Management Plan) which were discovered during an inspection which was conducted on 7/14/2009.”

Full case histories, milestones, violation types and EPA's complete case summaries for every plant are shown with a free Klarifi account. Create one

Largest penalties in Michigan

The 10 largest penalties assessed in EPA enforcement cases naming wastewater treatment plants in Michigan, with the value of the compliance actions each case required. Source: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO.
#PlantDateTypeOutcomePenaltyCompliance actionsSource
1Wyandotte Wastewater Plant
Wyandotte
May 1994
FY1986
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$413,000—ECHO 05-1986-0288
2Menominee WWTP
Menominee
Jan 1996
FY1987
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$340,000—ECHO 05-1987-0424
3Holland WWTP
Holland
Feb 2001
FY2000
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$94,600—ECHO 05-2000-0479
4Milford WWTP
Milford
Mar 1992
FY1988
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$70,000—ECHO 05-1988-0210
5Wixom WWTP
Wixom
Jul 1993
FY1986
Judicial case
Litigated With Penalty
$21,000—ECHO 05-1986-0287
6Milford WWTP
Milford
Jul 1989
FY1984
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$15,000—ECHO 05-1984-0009
7Lowell WWTP
Lowell
Aug 1990
FY1985
Judicial case
Final Order With Penalty
$13,000—ECHO 05-1985-0467
8Sault Ste. Marie Wastewater Treatment Plant
Sault Sainte Marie
Apr 2020
FY2020
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$11,200—ECHO 05-2020-7550
9City Of Mount Clemens Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mount Clemens
Oct 1993
FY1993
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$10,000—ECHO 05-1993-1561
10Warren Waste Water Treatment Plant
Warren
Jun 2007
FY2005
Administrative order
Final Order With Penalty
$8,766—ECHO 05-2005-0021

Actions by fiscal year

Fiscal yearFormal actionsPenalties
FY20181—
FY20191—
FY20202$11,200
FY20210—
FY20220—
FY20230—
FY20240—
FY20251—
FY20260—
FY20270—

EPA fiscal years run from 1 October to 30 September. The current year is partial.

EPA enforcement in Michigan: questions

  1. How many EPA enforcement actions have been taken against wastewater plants in Michigan?

    EPA's enforcement records list 45 formal civil enforcement cases naming publicly owned wastewater treatment plants in Michigan, 3 of them since fiscal year 2020. They involve 31 of the state's 335 plants. Informal actions such as notices of violation are not counted here.

  2. Which Michigan wastewater plant received the largest EPA penalty?

    Wyandotte Wastewater Plant in Wyandotte: $413,000 assessed in fiscal year 1986 (WAYNE COUNTY, MICH., Final Order With Penalty). Penalties are the amounts EPA records as assessed or agreed, not necessarily what was collected.

  3. What does an EPA administrative order mean for a wastewater plant?

    Most cases here are administrative orders under section 309 of the Clean Water Act: EPA finds permit violations, usually effluent limits or discharge without a permit, and orders the plant to return to compliance, often with a corrective action plan, a schedule and sometimes a penalty. Judicial cases go through the Department of Justice and typically end in a consent decree with a capital programme behind it. The latest case in Michigan is from Oct 2026.

Enforcement data: EPA ICIS-FE&C civil enforcement cases and ICIS compliance inspections, via ECHO. Penalties are the amounts assessed or agreed in each case as EPA records them. Latest case status in this data: Oct 2026.

Try Klarifi for free

Create your own trial account and explore how Klarifi can help you.

Try for freeOr book a demo
Wastewater market intelligence: facilities, permits, compliance and capital projects for North America and Europe.
© 2026 Klarifi ApS, Diplomvej 381, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Public data refreshed Nov 2, 2026